Burton AK 2L Cyclic Pant - Men's

Burton AK 2L Cyclic Pant - Men'sCLEARANCE

3 review(s)
Sizing Chart
Item#: BURT-100001-17, Mfg#: 100001  

Item is out of stock.

Style Number: 10000103
Details:
The Men’s Burton [ak] GORE-TEX® 2L Cyclic Pant is engineered with GUARANTEED TO KEEP YOU DRY® and built around the movements of high-energy riding. Its lightweight and breathable design keeps you comfortable in mid-summer hikes as well as in mid-winter riding sessions. This versatile pant is backcountry-approved and truly lives up to the hype. Made from the best fabric, GORE-TEX®!

Features:

+ bluesign® Approved Product: Excluding True Black Hombre Camo and Vintage Blue Colorways
+ WATERPROOFING: GORE-TEX® Plain Weave Fabric [Printed 2-Layer] [True Black Hombre Camo Colorway]
+ WATERPROOFING: Burton-Exclusive GORE-TEX® Oxford Fabric [2-Layer] [Vintage Blue Colorway]
+ WATERPROOFING: GORE-TEX® Dobby Fabric [2-Layer] [True Black Colorway]
+ WATERPROOFING: GORE-TEX® Plain Weave Fabric [2-Layer] [All Other Colorways]
+ WARMTH: Shell Mapped with Taffeta and Mesh Lining
+ Fully Taped Seams with GORE-SEAM® Tape
+ Articulated Fit
+ YKK® Matte Water-Resistant Zippers
+ Zippered Cargo Pocket with Tool Sleeve in Wearer’s Left Pocket

Customer Reviews

Submit a Review    

Cyclic pant
Posted by Brody (Certified Winter Enthusiast) on 11/6/2017

Pros:
Cons:

Would you recommend this product to a friend? Yes

Quality gore-tex pant. ultra lightweight, warm, dry and durable.

Warm and dry
Posted by Crickett (Certified Winter Enthusiast) on 10/30/2017

Pros:
Cons:

Would you recommend this product to a friend? Yes

These pants keep you dry and warm. last a long time if taken care of.

Amazing pant
Posted by Jordan seitzinger (Certified Winter Enthusiast) on 10/20/2016

Pros: Extremely lightweight
Cons: A little long

Would you recommend this product to a friend? Yes

Super lightweight pant. Fits great around your boots without being to baggy. Also a ton of cool features. Although it felt kinda long. I'm 5'8" and 145 lbs wearing a small and without boots fell a good 2 inches below my foot. It was much better with boots on but I would've liked them still to be a bit shorter